NXT Tour S vs DT Trusoft

RE: NXT Tour S vs DT Trusoft

Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:57:13 GMT

Thanks for your responses.

I actually still prefer the NXT Tour S from the golf balls on the market. I'm just miffed that the DT Trusoft seems to be a more capable ball than the NXT Tour S. At £13 more per dozen I expect the NXT Tours S to zip-back more than the DT Trusoft.
I just don't understand how Titleist can charge more for a lesser product.
Surely, Titleist must have realised during testing that DT Trusoft outperforms the NXT Tour S.

Is there a Titleist R&D guy on here to explain this?

Thanks.

RE: NXT Tour S vs DT Trusoft

Don O — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:18:15 GMT

Besides being a companion to the NXT-Tour, the -S version is a higher compression than the DT TruSoft. All 3 are Surlyn covers. With the 2017 Pro-V line, the NXT-Tour-S no longer is the most similar ball to the Pro-V1 in performance. So we'll have to wait until the PGA show in January will be on how the lines are adjusted in the 2018 Surlyn ball release. Not everybody likes the same ball or finds the same value. You should be glad the DT suits you best and is less expensive. There are indeed some that prefer the Tour-S. Viva la difference!

RE: NXT Tour S vs DT Trusoft

Dwayne N — Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:16:08 GMT

Everyone has different preferences they need or desire from their golf ball. What works for me may really stink for you. I think all Titleist balls are of excellent quality and they do a great job of offering a broad selection to appeal to mass majority of the public. I actually use two different titleist balls from winter to summer I feel one works better in the colder climate while I prefer the other as it warms. I am glad that you have found a ball that performs well for you and lucky you its less expensive